The capital of Yamal today is something familiar to everyone in the nineties. The investigating authorities are engaged in a detailed check on the territory of Novy Urengoy in relation to the owners of the houses. A statement was written to the law enforcement bodies only when the court ruled to satisfy the claim of the local entrepreneur. Then the plaintiff put forward claims, according to which the individual entrepreneur issued a large amount of money as a debt, which was not returned. Following these requirements, the IP added that an arrest be imposed on houses such as hostels, rented out for representatives of Novatek and Gazaprom. According to businessmen, the rentier was the victim of a raid and the seizure of real estate.
Returning to the story with this court case, Judge Cherepanov satisfied the claims of IP Bekov. It was Bekov who made demands on the rentier (Alexander Soloviev) in the amount of about 3 million rubles. According to Bekov, he gave this amount to Solovyov within the framework of 8 loan agreements. The debt collection of the individual entrepreneur was carried out within the framework of Article 395 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.
The individual entrepreneur also demanded from the court the seizure of Solovyov’s immovable objects, namely 5 objects on the territory of Novy Urengoy. These objects, or rather 5 dormitories, Soloviev handed over to representatives of Novatek and Gazprom.
Colleagues and associates of Solovyov report that the court session took place even without sending a notice to Soloviev. The process took place without him, his representatives. This is the usual well-tried scheme of raider seizure of real estate, in which interested persons from law enforcement agencies are involved.
As part of the process, the court decided not to seize real estate. This decision would have freed Bekov’s hands, who could have become a full-fledged owner of real estate if he had come with bailiffs.
Soloviev did not hesitate. Immediately on April 12, he sent an appeal to the Civil Affairs Collegium. At the moment, the consideration of the complaint was scheduled after May 15.
Also in March 2021, Solovyov appealed to the investigating authorities to submit an application, which initiated a verification of the documentation, which Bekov sent to the court as confirmation. Soloviev was confident of falsification. The businessman knows for sure that he did not sign such documents, and there is obvious falsification on the part of Bekov.
Soloviev asks to bring IP Bekov to justice in a criminal case under Article 303 of the Criminal Code. Bekov’s side is represented by his lawyer – Bekov Magomed. This person could be directly involved in the process of falsifying documents.
According to Solovyov, the entire scheme of Bekov’s actions contains clear signs of crimes of falsification of evidence in the framework of civil, administrative cases. Soloviev is confident that there will be evidence of Bekov’s illegal activities. The main problem is to honestly look for them. All claims were substantiated in the complaint. And in conclusion, Solovyov asked to start a check on the material he had presented, as well as to bring the perpetrators to criminal responsibility in accordance with the Criminal Code.
To date, the law enforcement agencies of Novy Urengoy continue to conduct an audit, and also carry out an examination of signatures in the loan agreements under consideration. Soloviev is awaiting these results so that there are facts confirming his innocence.